E-Zbornik use double-blind peer review.
It means the identity of both the author and reviewer is kept hidden. The authors’ identity is unknown to the reviewer and it will prevent the reviewer from forming any bias. Double-blind peer review ensures that the work is judged purely on its merit.
Each manuscript is evaluated by at least two independent reviewers at least one of who is a foreign member.
In the first contact with the reviewer, the Editorial Board sends only the title and abstract of the manuscript and after the reviewer's acceptance of the peer-review process, the reviewers are sent the manuscripts and review forms. Reviewers will get a manuscript and a review form which is to be filled in and submitted within a two months since the day of receipt.
Reviewers may ask for the extension of this deadline if they are not able to submit the review in the given time, which should be timely reported to the Editorial Board.
Peer-reviews are saved in the form sent by the reviewers. Reviewers shall assist in the improvement of the manuscript quality. Reviewers should respect the confidentiality of peer review and not reveal any details of the manuscript or its review, during or after the peer-review process. Also, no details of the rejected manuscript may be revealed.
Reviewers must be objective and their peer-reviews should be scientifically based. Revised versions may be sent to reviewers for re-review. The reviewers' suggestions to the submitted manuscript should be scientifically supported. Reviewers should not leave any traces of their identity in the manuscript which is to be sent to the author (such as comments or file names).
